Touchscreens were for me a lesson in humbleness: when they were first introduced, I was utterly convinced that they would never take off.

Inspired by the responses to the previous toot, I open the issue: what was you most blatantly wrong technological prophecy?

Mine:
- I was sure touchscreens would never take off.
- I believed that the idea of registering digital art on the blockchain was ridiculous

@entreprecariat 'I believed that the idea of registering digital art on the blockchain was ridiculous'

What changed your mind?

@rra let's put it like this: I still find it ridiculous, but I can't ignore the economy that NFT and stuff are "generating".

@rra from wp: "The NFT market value tripled in 2020, reaching more than $250 million. During the first quarter of 2021, NFT sales exceeded $2 billion."

@entreprecariat @rra
I think the Economics Explained video covers this pretty well. NFT art DOESN'T make sense, but neither does the actual physical art market. At the end of the day, people like to signal their wealth and signal the art that they care about. When every copy is identical, the certificate of authenticity becomes very important, and using a digital certificate of authenticity isn't a huge stretch.

Follow

@cjd @entreprecariat @rra @jplebreton I found this article very informative concerning the market and who is profiting from it: thatkimparker.medium.com/most-

for me it is quite obvious why NFT and the art market go so well together: they share an obsession with provenance / authenticity, and the generation of value is based on speculation in both cases too. It's a perfect match in economic character, and the talking about the democratization of the art market is a rationalization, that cannot hold its promises, as the numbers show.

· · Web · 0 · 5 · 5
Sign in to participate in the conversation
post.lurk.org

Welcome to post.lurk.org, an instance for discussions around cultural freedom, experimental, new media art, net and computational culture, and things like that.