@brunopostle @lgm @aiscarvalho When we proposed these terms, one of the issues in mind was how vast the "design" term is. In this case, we meant to encompass most fields of design, not just software-directed or digital-based.
The "F/LOSS design" term is actually my favourite because it refers to the tools used in the design process.
I really prefer "FLO Design" and of the options presented, I most like "Libre Design"
I don't like "F/LOSS" and I oppose just "open source" though not so dogmatically like some people.
Note that FLO and Libre both imply that the idea that the designs are FLO too, not just that design *software* is FLO.
@lgm personally, none of the propositions looks really good to me. Nobody around me uses the term F/LOSS, Open Source Design is already taken and Libre Design is not that catchy. still, the latest got my vote.
can we try to have something as catchy as the "Reclaim your Tools" that has been created for the LGM 2010?