@entreprecariat 'I believed that the idea of registering digital art on the blockchain was ridiculous'
What changed your mind?
@rra let's put it like this: I still find it ridiculous, but I can't ignore the economy that NFT and stuff are "generating".
@entreprecariat @rysiek @rra if your initial conclusion was simply that it was ridiculous, you were absolutely not wrong. after the hype explosion earlier this year the space is now mostly a cesspool of crypto pump-and-dumpers (NFTs help create a smokescreen of legitimacy around crypto in general) with a few diehard artists still begging for attention at the fringes.
I think the Economics Explained video covers this pretty well. NFT art DOESN'T make sense, but neither does the actual physical art market. At the end of the day, people like to signal their wealth and signal the art that they care about. When every copy is identical, the certificate of authenticity becomes very important, and using a digital certificate of authenticity isn't a huge stretch.
@cjd @entreprecariat @rra @jplebreton I found this article very informative concerning the market and who is profiting from it: https://thatkimparker.medium.com/most-artists-are-not-making-money-off-nfts-and-here-are-some-graphs-to-prove-it-c65718d4a1b8
for me it is quite obvious why NFT and the art market go so well together: they share an obsession with provenance / authenticity, and the generation of value is based on speculation in both cases too. It's a perfect match in economic character, and the talking about the democratization of the art market is a rationalization, that cannot hold its promises, as the numbers show.
A fediverse community for discussions around cultural freedom, experimental, new media art, net and computational culture, and things like that.