Start of the session Re-imagining #copyleft with a 20th anniversary, Constant in 1999, first endeavor in #copyright. Poster by #Harrisson
#SéverineDusollier brings back #Houellebecq #Wikipedia case.
"Activist: Because Houellebecq re-used a share-alike license, that should make the license apply to the novel, so someone else took houellebecq's book and shared it online. Was quickly removed by the publisher. He used content without attribution to Wikipedia/authors of the page. Who would complain about this? So many authors, hundreds? In French law all authors should have done an action together. Needs to be authors who 'contribute original material' not removing the commas :-) So making that filtering, already complicated.
CC licenses don't address this type of complexity, relying on copyright laws which have such limited understanding of authorship / creation... Wikipedia is more related to a weird mix of authors, contributrs, robots..."
Extract from collective pad notes, to be published later.
Let's continue to funnel some part of live notes to here. With #DanielBlangaGubbay who dance and codirect the KuntenFestivaldesArts "From expression to circulation
from property to use
It’s not the movement of the body, but by the body.
Dance is made of an encounter between movement and bodies.
The movement of movements between different bodies.
We have to see also the other aspect; if we make exactly the same movement now as a month ago
Does the movement exists indipendently of its appearance materialized in the movements of different bodies?
We need to imagine continuous life of the mouvement
A circulation of bodies inside the life of one movement
Dance is where the bodies occupy the movement
Bodies visualize the life of the mouvement at certain moment
'she moves, she's still alive'
But here the bodies show it’s the movement that is still alive.
which is a not-body
dance gives possibility to exceed the antropocentric vision of life"
#EvaWeinmayr, piracy project, interesting collection of colophons.
"An antilope in the savanna is considered to be a wild animal. An antilope in the zoo in Europe is considered as a document, analyzed as a specimen. Primary document (caged antilope) produces all series of secondary documents - From Qu'est-ce que la documentation, essay by #SuzanneBriet"
"In order to continue thinking about collective authorship, perhaps we need more contracts/coc instead of permissive licenses. Boxing as an exercise of mutuality."
[With lot of stuff in between]
#FreeCulture and #CreativeCommons as a regression.
"This criticism is not nostalgia.
There is a regression that needs to be fixed. From a means (a tool to discuss an idea for society) it became an end. Critique on free culture is complicated, quickly misunderstood. There has been a lot of radical experimentation with intellectual property (60s/70s). Nowadays, it's more likely that you're introduced to intellectual property experiments through creative commons and remixing culture. What is the act of sharing? A highly priviledged position? As free licenses are a higher level of copyright... Would an injection in the existing copyright law perhaps open up many more possibilities? While recreating boundaries, it is possible to exclude others again."
Four groups working during the afternoon. All bruto notes on
And the clear need to plan a next step.
Welcome to post.lurk.org, an instance for discussions around cultural freedom, experimental, new media art, net and computational culture, and things like that.